Subscribe for 12 months with recurring billing - $199

Buy 12 months of subscription time - $199


Search Gold Prices
Gold Price
[Most Recent Quotes from]
Our RSS Feed

Gold Updates by Mail

Enter your email address:

Follow Us on Twitter
« CAMBIOR INCORPORATED: 36% profit in 3 months! | Main | Kinross Gold Corporation: $500 million loan agreed »

THE GREAT GOLD DEBATE: Different argument, same result!

Where are gold prices going? What's in store for gold? Why invest in gold? Which gold stocks to purchase? Three of the precious metals industries heavyweights battle it out.

Last night we managed to catch 'The Great Gold Debate' via the web on It was good to see Paul van Eeden and John Embry on the same stage. For good measure they also had an Elliot Wave analyst called Steven Hochberg. The only let down was Lou Schizas, who managed to select plonkers from the audience to pose questions, shame!

The point that got us was that for different reasons both Embry and Van Eeden came to a similar conclusion; that gold was going up. Their predictions ranged from the gold price now to $1650 per ounce by Embry and up to £1350 per ounce by Van Eeden.

John Embry is in the GATA camp and produced data confirming central bank manipulation of the gold price and Paul Van Eeden referred to various metrics to suggest that this was not so.

Its well worth a watch if you have the time.

John Embry, chief investment strategist, Sprott Asset Management
Paul van Eeden, president, Cranberry Capital
Steven Hochberg, chief market analyst, Elliot Wave International

21 September 2006

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>