Subscribe for 12 months with recurring billing - $199

Buy 12 months of subscription time - $199

 

Search Gold Prices
Gold Price
[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
Our RSS Feed

Gold Updates by Mail

Enter your email address:

Follow Us on Twitter
« Portugal Request a Bailout | Main | Gold Prices Update 06 April 2011 »
Wednesday
Apr062011

High River Gold Limited 06 April 2011

HRG Logo 31 July 2009.JPG

Always appreciated we now have an update from Chris Charlwood who has very kindly sent us this missive updating us on the current state of play over at High River Gold Mines Limited (HRG) which we hope that you find interesting and informative.


To HRG Shareholders/Potential Investors,
 
HRG released its Q4 and year end results last week and following are some important data points:
 
Existing
1)    Gold revenues 2010 of $435.61M , Q4 of $123.3M ($493M annualized).
2)    Cash flow 2010 of $155.9M , Q4 of $49.3M  ($197.2M annualized).
3)    Net income 2010 of $114.9M, Q4 of $22.3M ($89.2M annualized).
4)    2010 notable expenses – Mine Amortization & Depletion $60.7M, Exploration $15.5M
5)    Gold production 2010 of 329.9K oz, Q4 of  87.9K oz. (351.6k oz annualized).
6)    Liquid Assets of $263.5M ($153.9M cash and $109.6M third party stock).
7)    Debt (& interest) of $25.2M
8)    Liquid Assets net of debt - $238.3M
9)    CIM Classified gold reserves (Proven & Probable) of 3.75M oz, CIM Classified gold resources (Measured and Indicated) 5.1M oz and Inferred of .7M oz. Silver resources of 103M oz (Measured & Indicated) and 102M oz of Inferred. HRG owns 50% of the silver property Prognoz. 50% in gold equivalent = 2.8M oz (@ 73 to 1)
10) Proven operational management team.
 
Potential
1)    2M oz of additional gold at Bissa.
2)    50% of 363M oz of additional silver at Prognoz (4.9M oz gold equivalent).
3)    Severstal is built in buyer of minority shares.
4)    Gold likely to trade at $1500-$1600 oz in 2011.
5)    Zun-Holba and Irokinda mine lives likely to be extended.
 
HRG is trading at 3.7 times Q4 cash flow (net of  liquid assets and debt). 840M shares @ $1.14= $958M market cap - $238.3M net liquid assets / $197M annualized cash flow).
 
It has been two years since we minority shareholders realized that Severstal (which had just made a controlling investment in HRG), was strategizing to buy us out. The signal for us was the string of extremely negative press releases put out by HRG management (Severstal employees). Our hunch was correct. The first proposal  came in at $.18/share. 90% of us knew the underlying value of the business and did not tender our shares. It’s now 2 years later and the above results prove our point. Today, many of us remain invested with full resolve to see the fair value of this company. What is the fair value?  Anyone would be hard pressed to find another gold producer that trades at HRG’s low cash flow multiple. By any comparisons, HRG should be trading at double to triple the current price. If Prognoz value is released, then even that would be conservative.
 
Those that invest now or remain invested will be rewarded. At some point, Severstal/Nord Gold will have to realize its value on its 72.64% ownership in HRG. Q1 results will come out on May 15th.  If production remains the same as Q4, we will see $51M of cash flow (avg. gold price up $25 from Q4) -  but we may get surprised with increased production from the second ball mill at Berezitovy. In the Nord Gold prospectus, Management said they spent $9.8M in the first 9 months of 2010 on drilling and exploration works at Irokinda and Zun-Holba. They also stated that  they are “planning to invest US$23.2 million in 2011 on modernisation of the underground site within exploration projects and US$14.9 million on purchasing new production equipment and other mine fixed assets." As Irokinda and Zun-Holba mines are running low on gold, we look forward to the drill results due by the end of June.
 
Also, we look forward to a resolution between the battling parties that own Prognoz 50/50. Prognoz is ranked as the world’s 10th largest silver property but actually ranks first in grade at up to 704 g/ton. We hope that these 50/50 owners can come to some equitable agreement soon. They did have an agreement that fell through in 2008. Although shareholders at the time did not like the proposed structure, I would think something like the following would make sense in today’s market:
 
1)    HRG could spin out its 50% holding in Prognoz into a new Canadian listed Pubco.
2)    Pubco would then issue an equal number of shares to other party to gain 100% ownership.
3)    Each party would elect 4 Board members.
4)    Pubco should then secure a large financing with a third party who gets 3 Board seats.
5)    The Board then hires a management team that does not work for either party.
 
Such a transaction will immediately unlock the value of Prognoz for all parties. This would  leave HRG as a pure play gold producer and give Pubco the ability to get started with development of the Prognoz property.
 
In terms of unlocking HRG’s value -  if and when Severstal decides to do so – the following actions would build investor confidence:
 
1)    Hire an IR company.
2)    Put out more detailed news releases on financials comparing quarters and years.
3)    Give guidance as to future productions levels and resource growth.
4)    Hold investor conference calls.
5)    Meet with analysts in Canada and Europe to start coverage on HRG.
6)    Attend mining shows and make presentations.
 
Based on recent low trading volume, there are very few sellers of this stock. Any significant demand should help us eclipse the $1.50 high.
 
HRG Q4 and 2010 results
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/High-River-Gold-Reports-2010-ccn-4024813489.html?x=0&.v=1
 
Prognoz potential – pages 4 & 6 of “The Summary”
http://www.hrg.ca/i/pdf/TechRpt_Micon_Prognoz_080627.pdf
 
Interesting excerpts from 2010 year end Financials and Annual Information Form
http://freepdfhosting.com/dd696431ad.pdf
 
HRG’s Third Party Investments
http://freepdfhosting.com/676b9c324f.pdf                                  
 
Chris Charlwood
Investor – own 5M shares of HRG
Rainerc7@gmail.com – to be added or removed from this e-mail list.
604-718-2668
www.stockhouse.com – ongoing HRG investor communication



.................................................................................

Over in the Options pit, our model portfolio has managed an average return of 41.23% per trade, 68 closed trades, 66 closed at a profit, or a 97% success rate. Average trade open for 42.76 days.

SK Chart with profits re-invested 29 March 2011.JPG


The above progress chart shows our performance when profits are re-invested, however, to see exactly how it is going, please click this link.

So, the question is: Are you going to make the decision to join us today.

Stay on your toes and have a good one.

Got a comment then please add it to this article, all opinions are welcome and very much appreciated by both our readership and the team here.


To stay updated on our market commentary, which gold stocks we are buying and why, please subscribe to The Gold Prices Newsletter, completely FREE of charge. Simply click here and enter your email address. (Winners of the GoldDrivers Stock Picking Competition 2007)

For those readers who are also interested in the silver bull market that is currently unfolding, you may want to subscribe to our Free Silver Prices Newsletter.

For those readers who are also interested in the nuclear power sector you may want to subscribe to our Free Uranium Stocks Newsletter, just click here.






PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

By John Helmer, Moscow

Alexei Mordashov, owner of the Severstal steelmaking and mining group (lapel button), has instructed the executives in his goldmining arm Nord Gold to prepare for another shot at selling their shares at an initial public offering (IPO) in London before Christmas.

He’s also told them that the sooner they can buy out the Canadian minority shareholders of High River Gold (HRG:CN), the sooner the IPO can go to market – and the sooner they can earn their bonuses.

The news, which Severstal and Nord Gold decline to corroborate for the moment, comes from what Bloomberg terms two people familiar with the matter. In mid-January, Bloomberg reported that three underwriters – Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse and Troika Dialog (JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs refused or were dropped) – were planning to list 25% of Nord Gold at an enterprise valuation of $4 billion, with $760 million of the proceeds to go to Mordashov, and $240 million to Nord Gold.

A fortnight later, when the prospectus was released to the London market, the division of proceeds had been modified, cutting Mordashov’s take, but leaving Nord Gold with almost no cash in hand after it clears the related party loans, financings, interest charges, administrative costs, and other obligations between Nord Gold and the Severstal group.

“If successful,” Bloomberg roostered, “Nord Gold’s IPO would be London’s biggest since…”— but it failed. For the reasons, here’s the full story.

The publication of the Nord Gold prospectus was the first time Mordashov has allowed his men to respond to criticism of his stock market tactics, takeover strategy, and asset valuations. Strikingly, he admitted to the possibility that he didn’t know what he was doing. “A substantial portion of the Group’s assets,” acknowledges the prospectus, “were obtained through the acquisition of interests in public companies, and limited due diligence was conducted in connection with such acquisitions.”

That’s not what minority shareholders of HRG believe in Canada, for they have organized one of the most effective internet-based campaigns ever mounted in Canada to resist Mordashov’s attempts to buy them out. He has been trying since the spring of 2009, with a first offer of 8 cents per share. He then increased this in two new offers to 22 cents and then 30 cents. By the time Nord Gold was ready for the London Stock Exchange, Mordashov’s stake in HRG amounted to 73%. Supposing that he and arms-length companies allied to him have not been able to buy more shares in the market – Canadian regulations require disclosure of stake increases of 2% or more — the resisting institutional and individual investors have hung on to around 27%. One of the resisters estimates that Mordashov must buy 147 million more HRG shares to reach the 90% threshold. At that point, Canadian stock market rules allow them to proceed with a mandatory buy-out offer to the remaining shareholders.

Investment bankers told Minesite after the Nord Gold IPO was withdrawn in February that, because HRG amounts to more than half the value of Nord Gold, “they [Mordashov and Nord Gold] really need to consolidate HRG, but the minorities there are not going to give in so easily after Mordashov tried to shaft them a couple of times. Can’t do that so easily in Canada.” On the full-year results published to date, HRG amounted to 56% of Nord Gold’s gold production (589,100 troy ounces) and almost the same percentage of its revenues ($754 million).

Nord Gold’s website no longer makes the January prospectus accessible. Instead, it has released its first-quarter 2011 production and financial results, claiming big gains on the first quarter of 2010. Gold production was 174,193 oz; revenues US$244 million; earnings (Ebitda) US$135.1 million; and net income US$95.6 million. But these results are not broken down to reveal how much has been contributed by HRG. The Canadian company won’t release its first-quarter results until June 14; its second-quarter results on August 15.

Sources close to Mordashov and Nord Gold believe he’s agreed to offer C$1.50 per share. With the share currently trading between C$1.15 and C$1.18 – that’s a premium of 27%. In the year to date, HRG hit an offer price peak of $1.50 when there was market speculation of a successful Nord Gold IPO. It then sunk to a low of 98 cents in March. Three years ago, in 2008 before the company ran into operational and financial difficulties, and before Mordashov bought his control stake, HRG traded from a high of $3.37 and a low of 6 cents.

The tale of Mordashov’s takeover, and the Canadian resistance, can be found here.

It is not the only consolidation attempt Mordashov has been making to fatten Nord Gold for its second IPO try. The tale of attempts at putting the big Russian silver deposit Prognoz into bankruptcy was first told a year ago. The biggest unmined silver deposit in Russia is years away from mining – and Mordashov may transfer the financing requirement for that to the public shareholders of Nord Gold, if he can persuade them to buy into Nord Gold this year. In the meantime, his efforts to take control of the 50% stake in Prognoz he doesn’t already own has failed after a series of Russian commercial court rulings concluded on May 25. This also eliminates market uncertainty that Mordashov’s hold on his half of the Prognoz asset might slip.

Meanwhile from Toronto, the message from the HRG minorities is that the latest offer is too little. “If Nord Gold makes a $1.50 offer,” says one source, “they will be working against HRG’s Q1 and Q2 results. Unless they come up with some write offs or other trickery, both these quarters should be the best results to date for HRG.”

According to another, the damage inflicted on the HRG share price during two years of takeover bidding has kept down the share price, but boomeranged on Nord Gold. “They have to consolidate HRG, because there is too much good news coming. As is evident from the financials, HRG is even ‘lending’ its money to Nord Gold in the form of management fees, consulting fees, etc. Why would anyone buy Nord Gold if they treat their stockholders so poorly?”

by John Helmer - Wednesday, June 1st, 2011 http://johnhelmer.net/?p=5386

June 1, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterVincent

www.highrivergold.net

July 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterVincent

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>